Moral Theology and Ethics Relativism
Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God (Rom 11:33)
Site Index North Forest

Relativism

by John Shepard

February, 2002

Overview

It is intellectually fashionable to declare that there are no absolutes. And many who wish to deny absolute standards of morality also use as their main argument the question, "who decides what the moral standards are?" This article addresses these issues.

The Absolutes | Problems with Relativism | A Real World Example | Religion | The Psychology of a Relativist


The Absolutes

I propose the following as absolutes, which even relativists must agree are absolutes.

  1. The natural laws -- Time, space, energy, matter, and the laws of nature.
  2. Historical facts -- It's not always easy to determine what they are, particularly if they occurred a long time ago. But some we can know, for example, that on September 11, 2001 the Twin Towers in New York collapsed.
  3. Innate human attributes such as:
  4. The desirability of an orderly society -- Implications:
  5. Human psychology is "designed" with built-in absolutes. Examples:
  6. Human Traits. Some are highly desirable, others undesirable. The good traits lead to improved peace of mind, peace among each other, cooperation, and enhanced quality of life. The bad traits destroy relationships and unity.

Moral Theology and Ethics | North Forest | Top of page


Problems with Relativism

A problem with relativism is that it asserts that each person has the right to choose values that he or she can adopt. This is true to a degree (provided the absolutes are not violated). But followed to its logical conclusion it leads to the annihilation of human society and the human species. Examples:

Moral Theology and Ethics | North Forest | Top of page


A Real World Example

Person A believes that the earth is flat.

Person B believes it is round.

A relativist might be tempted to say that the earth is flat for person A, because that's what's true for him or her.

This is incorrect because the absolute truth (that the world is round) will always take precedence over a relative truth.

Thus we see that what relativists call relative truth is not truth at all, but merely belief.

Person A believes that the earth is flat (thinking this belief to be true) and commits his will to the proposition.

When we say "it's true for me," what we are really saying is "I believe it and live as if it's true." We should also be willing to say, "if I discover that my belief contradicts absolute truth, then I will change my belief to conform."

Moral Theology and Ethics | North Forest | Top of page


Religion

Many religious systems contain some element of truth.

But there are universal absolute truths. For example:

  1. There either:

    (a) is a God, or

    (b) isn't a God.

    If (b) is true, then atheists are correct.

  2. If there is a God, his nature is either:

    (a) Personal God (ala Judaism, Christianity, and Islam), or

    (b) All is God (Pantheism, Monism), or

    (c) Can't be known by humans (Agnostic, Deism), or

    (d) Other

  3. Moral absolutes (Thou shall not). I have demonstrated in a previous section that these exist and I have listed some of them. Such things as murder, adultery, sex outside marriage, abortion, lying, etc.

Each person chooses an opinion on these issues and believes it as true. In each of these issues there is an absolute truth, but how can we know and how can we agree?

So we must allow different beliefs. But we must adhere to the absolute truths I listed in a previous section or suffer the consequences (violence in society, human suffering caused by man's inhumanity to man, psychological disorders, etc.).

Moral Theology and Ethics | North Forest | Top of page


The Psychology of a Relativist

Why would someone want to be a relativist in the face of such overwhelming evidence? Some possibilities:

  1. Perhaps they have rejected dogmatic religious beliefs. But relativism is not the only necessary belief in such cases.
  2. Perhaps they want to justify their practice of vice. An example of this is people who want to engage in promiscuous sexual practices. But consider the hurt and mistrust when these relationships are terminated and the decrease of human dignity as these people learn that others value them merely as objects to satisfy their pleasure. The moral absolute which is free from these problems is to have one sexual partner for life in the context of marriage (even homosexuals want to be allowed to marry).
  3. Perhaps they want freedom from God and His absolute moral laws. But as I have shown, there are moral absolutes whether or not we even consider God -- moral absolutes are a reality.
  4. Perhaps it has never occurred to them that there are opposing views. Perhaps they are just going along with what the culture at large teaches.

Moral Theology and Ethics | North Forest | Top of page



© Copyright 2007 by John Shepard


Links: North Forest | Moral Theology and Ethics | Journey | email us

Please feel free to email:  js16@northforest.org 
 http://www.northforest.org/MoralTheologyEthics/relativism.html Moral Theology and Ethics
 Revised: Sept 21, 2001